Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Login


Indonesian Journal on Health Science and Medicine

 Submit manuscript
Section Articles

The Importance of Neurophysiology in the Study of Predators and Herbivores: A Neuroecological Perspective

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Desember:
DOI : https://doi.org/10.21070/ijhsm.v2i3.304
Published : Nov 23, 2025

Hasanain Mohammed Hasan (1)

(1) Educational Directorate of Karbala, Iraq
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

Predator–herbivore interactions are central to ecological dynamics, shaping species evolution, population stability, and ecosystem function. Recent advances in neurophysiology have revealed mechanistic layers underlying these interactions, encompassing sensory processing, stress and fear responses, decision-making, learning, and memory. This review synthesizes findings from the past five years to highlight how neural circuits mediate predator detection, prey evasion, and adaptive behaviors, emphasizing individual variation, sex differences, and developmental plasticity. We discuss sensory neurophysiology in both predators and herbivores, showing how multimodal integration, context-dependent processing, and plasticity influence behavior in natural environments. Stress neurobiology and fear responses are explored, illustrating the role of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, limbic circuits, and neurotransmitter dynamics in shaping acute and long-term responses to predation risk. Decision-making, learning, and memory are examined as mechanisms by which experience modifies predator and prey strategies, with implications for co-evolution and ecological fitness. Evolutionary and ecological implications are considered, including the role of neurophysiology in driving selective pressures, shaping trophic interactions, and mediating non-consumptive effects that influence community structure. Finally, we highlight emerging technological advances—such as portable neural imaging, electrophysiology, genomic analyses, and machine learning approaches—that enable integration of neurophysiological data with behavioral and ecological research. Understanding these neurobiological mechanisms not only uncovers hidden layers of predator–herbivore dynamics but also provides actionable insights for wildlife management, conservation planning, and ecosystem restoration. By bridging mechanistic neuroscience with ecological and evolutionary theory, this review emphasizes the value of neurophysiology as a critical tool for predicting behavioral responses and resilience in changing environments.

Highlights



  1. Neurophysiology reveals how sensory processing, stress circuits, and learning mechanisms shape predator detection, prey avoidance, and behavioral adaptation.

  2. Predator cues drive significant neural and hormonal responses—often sex-specific and long-lasting—that influence decision-making and ecological fitness.

  3. Integrating neural mechanisms with ecological models enhances predictions of predator–herbivore dynamics, especially under environmental and anthropogenic change.

References

[1] M. J. Beetz, “A perspective on neuroethology: what the past teaches us about the future of neuroethology,” J. Comp. Physiol. A, vol. 210, pp. 325–346, 2024.

[2] T. Anttonen, T. Burghi, L. Duvall, M. P. Fernandez, G. Gutierrez, F. Kermen, et al., “Neurobiology and changing ecosystems: mechanisms underlying responses to human-generated environmental impacts,” J. Neurosci., vol. 43, no. 45, pp. 7530–7537, 2023.

[3] I. W. Keesey, “Sensory neuroecology and multimodal evolution across the genus Drosophila,” Front. Ecol. Evol., vol. 10, p. 932344, 2022.

[4] P. Sunde, F. Böcker, G. R. Rauset, P. Kjellander, M. Chrenkova, T. M. Skovdal, et al., “Mammal responses to predator scents across multiple study areas,” Ecosphere, vol. 13, no. 8, p. e4215, 2022.

[5] N. D. Harrison, R. Steven, B. L. Phillips, J. M. Hemmi, A. F. Wayne, and N. J. Mitchell, “Identifying the most effective behavioural assays and predator cues for quantifying anti-predator responses in mammals: a systematic review,” Environ. Evid., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 5, 2023.

[6] M. Bárbara, I. Ornelas, E. D. da Silva, et al., “Olfactory behavioural and neural responses of planktivorous lacustrine sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) to prey odours,” J. Fish Biol., 2022.

[7] A. Graeve, I. Ioannidou, J. Reinhard, D. M. Görl, A. Faissner, and L. C. Weiss, “Brain volume increase and neuronal plasticity underlie predator-induced morphological defense expression in Daphnia longicephala,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 12612, 2021.

[8] C. Shang, A. Liu, D. Li, Z. Xie, Z. Chen, M. Huang, Y. Li, Y. Wang, W. L. Shen, and P. Cao, “A subcortical excitatory circuit for sensory-triggered predatory hunting in mice,” Nat. Neurosci., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 909–920, Jun. 2019.

[9] Y. Zhou, J. Cao, J. Fox, and Y. Yu, “Cross-sensory modulation in a future top predator, the young Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus),” Anim. Behav., 2023.

[10] L. Wang and M. S. Fanselow, “Neurocircuitry of predatory hunting,” Neurosci. Bull., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 817–831, 2023.

[11] P. Jovanovic, A.-H. Pool, N. Morones, Y. Wang, E. Novinbakht, N. Keshishian, K. Jang, Y. Oka, and C. E. Riera, “A sex-specific thermogenic neurocircuit induced by predator smell recruiting cholecystokinin neurons in the dorsomedial hypothalamus,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, p. 4937, 2023.

[12] C. S. Wilkinson, H. L. Blount, M. Schwendt, and L. A. Knackstedt, “Brain monoamine dysfunction in response to predator scent stress accompanies stress-susceptibility in female rats,” Biomolecules, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1055, 2023.

[13] H. Thapa, A. Salahinejad, A. L. Crane, et al., “Background predation risk induces anxiety-like behaviour and predator neophobia in zebrafish,” Anim. Cogn., vol. 27, p. 69, 2024.

[14] M. V. Kondashevskaya, H. F. Downey, V. E. Tseilikman, V. V. Alexandrin, K. A. Artem’yeva, V. V. Aleksankina, O. B. Tseilikman, A. A. Pashkov, A. V. Goryacheva, I. S. Ivleva, M. N. Karpenko, V. A. Shatilov, and E. B. Manukhina, “Cerebral blood flow in predator stress-resilient and -susceptible rats and mechanisms of resilience,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 23, no. 23, p. 14729, 2022.

[15] I. P. Neylan, E. K. Longman, E. Sanford, J. J. Stachowicz, and A. Sih, “Long-term anti-predator learning and memory differ across populations and sexes in an intertidal snail Nucella canaliculata,” Proc. R. Soc. B, vol. 291, no. 2032, 2024.

[16] A. L. Crane, G. H. Achtymichuk, I. A. E. Rivera-Hernández, A. A. Pregola, H. Thapa, and M. C. O. Ferrari, “Uncertainty about old information results in differential predator memory in tadpoles,” Proc. R. Soc. B, vol. 290, no. 1998, p. 20230746, 2023.

[17] C. C. Ganci, L. McKay, L. Hunninck, and M. J. Sheriff, “Impacts of predation risk on learning and memory of free-living mice,” Proc. R. Soc. B, vol. 292, no. 2041, p. 20241978, 2025.

[18] S. I. Zhu and G. J. Goodhill, “From perception to behavior: The neural circuits underlying prey hunting in larval zebrafish,” Front. Neural Circuits, vol. 17, p. 1087993, 2023.

[19] D. W. Kikuchi, W. L. Allen, K. Arbuckle, T. G. Aubier, E. S. Briolat, E. R. Burdfield-Steel, et al., “The evolution and ecology of multiple antipredator defences,” J. Evol. Biol., vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 975–991, 2023.

[20] Z.-D. Zhao, L. Zhang, X. Xiang, D. Kim, H. Li, P. Cao, and W. L. Shen, “Neurocircuitry of predatory hunting,” Neurosci. Bull., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 817–831, 2023.

[21] A. Batabyal, “Predator–prey systems as models for integrative research in biology: The value of a non-consumptive effects framework,” J. Exp. Biol., vol. 226, no. 19, p. jeb245851, 2023.

[22] S. O. Lehtinen, “Ecological and evolutionary consequences of predator-prey role reversal: Allee effect and catastrophic predator extinction,” J. Theor. Biol., vol. 510, p. 110542, 2021.

[23] Y. Niimura, A. Matsui, and K. Touhara, “Diet shapes the evolution of the vertebrate bitter taste receptor gene repertoire,” Mol. Biol. Evol., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 347–354, 2014.

[24] J. R. Fetcho, T. Yang, et al., “Functional evolution of vertebrate sensory receptors: identifying residues associated with sensory shifts,” J. Comp. Physiol. A, vol. 206, no. 5, pp. 645–658, 2020.

[25] Y. Fu, G. Xu, S. Gao, L. Feng, Q. Guo, and H. Yang, “LiDAR reveals the process of vision-mediated predator–prey relationships,” Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 15, p. 3730, 2022.

[26] Y. Papastamatiou, N. Hammerschlag, et al., “Dynamic energy landscapes of predators and the implications for modifying prey risk,” Funct. Ecol., 2024.

[27] J. A. Smith, L. K. Taylor, et al., “Cognitive ecology of surprise in predator-prey interactions,” Funct. Ecol., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 664–680, 2025.

[28] V. V. Pravosudov and T. C. Roth, “Cognitive ecology of food hoarding: decision making, learning and memory,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, vol. 375, no. 1793, p. 20190497, 2020.