Login
Section Articles

When Pregnancy Meets Nuclear Medicine: Diagnostic Challenges and Safety Protocols

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Desember:

Omar Ziad Mohammad Obeidat (1), Hashem Khaled Omar Shajrawi (2), Salem Jarir Salem Al Rabadi (3), Ra'id Majed Ali Abu Alkishek (4), Bara'a Khalid Abdulhadi Khlaifat (5)

(1) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Princess Haya Bint Al-Hussein Military Hospital, Jordan
(2) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince Hashem Bin Al-Hussein Military Hospital, Jordanian Royal Medical Services, Zarqa Governorate, Jordan
(3) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Princess Haya Bint Al-Hussein Military Hospital Jordanian Royal Medical Services Ajloun Governorate, Jordan
(4) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Princess zaid bin alhusein Military Hospital, Jordanian Royal Medical Services, Tafileh Governorate, Jordan
(5) Department of Nuclear Medicine, Al-hussein medical city, Jordanian Royal Medical Services, amman Governorate, Jordan
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

Nuclear medicine plays a critical role in diagnosing and managing various medical conditions by using radiopharmaceuticals for functional imaging. While these procedures are generally safe for the general population, using them during pregnancy presents unique clinical challenges. The physiological changes that occur during pregnancy can alter the pharmacokinetics of radiotracers, which complicates image interpretation and dose estimation. Additionally, the potential for ionizing radiation to affect fetal development raises serious ethical and medical concerns. To systematically examine the diagnostic challenges and safety considerations associated with the use of nuclear medicine during pregnancy, this article conducts a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature, clinical guidelines, and expert consensus protocols. A qualitative narrative review approach was employed using medical databases such as PubMed, SciSpace, and Google Scholar. Relevant studies were identified using the following terms: “nuclear medicine,” “pregnancy,” “radiological safety,” “radiopharmaceuticals,” and “fetal exposure.” Current evidence suggests that most nuclear medicine diagnostic procedures result in fetal doses below 20 mSv, which is below the threshold associated with deterministic effects. The safe practice of nuclear medicine during pregnancy requires striking a careful balance between the clinical needs of the mother and the protection of the fetus. This requires adhering to the ALARA principle and using modern dosimetry methods.


Highlights



  1. Most diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures during pregnancy deliver fetal doses below thresholds associated with deterministic effects.

  2. Physiological changes in pregnancy significantly alter radiopharmaceutical pharmacokinetics, complicating image interpretation and fetal dose estimation.

  3. Strict justification, ALARA-based optimization, and multidisciplinary protocols enable safe nuclear medicine use while protecting fetal development.

References

[1] S. Mattsson, S. Leide-Svegborn, M. Andersson, and M. Andersson, “X-ray and molecular imaging during pregnancy and breastfeeding—When should we be worried?” Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, vol. 195, nos. 3–4, pp. 197–204, 2021, doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncab041.

[2] C. Kappas, “Pregnancy and medical radiation,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., vol. 200, p. 110478, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110478.

[3] L. R. Motavalli, H. M. Hakimabad, and E. H. Azghadi, “Fetal and maternal dose assessment for diagnostic scans during pregnancy,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 3596–3608, 2016, doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/9/3596.

[4] C. J. Martin et al., “Guidance on prevention of unintended and accidental radiation exposures in nuclear medicine,” J. Radiol. Prot., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. R1–R28, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab19d8.

[5] A. M. Alessio, M. B. Farrell, and F. H. Fahey, “Role of reference levels in nuclear medicine: A report of the SNMMI dose optimization task force,” J. Nucl. Med., vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 1912–1918, 2015, doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160861.

[6] C. Happel et al., “Nuklearmedizinische Strahlenexpositionen während der Schwangerschaft,” Angew. Nuklearmedizin, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 134–143, 2023, doi: 10.1055/a-1802-8458.

[7] H.-T. Chang, Y.-C. Chang, F.-Y. Hsu, and C.-H. Hsu, “Assessment of foetal dose and occupational exposure for pregnant workers in nuclear medicine using the Taiwanese pregnancy phantom,” Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, vol. 200, no. 15, pp. 1456–1463, 2024, doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncae181.

[8] K.-A. Eastwood and A. R. Mohan, “Imaging in pregnancy,” Obstet. Gynaecol., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 259–269, 2019, doi: 10.1111/tog.12604.

[9] M. Gomes, “About the fetal risks from diagnostic use of radiation during pregnancy: A systematic review and proposal of clinical protocol,” J. Nucl. Med. Radiat. Ther., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2015, doi: 10.4172/1948-5956.c1.069.

[10] L. Guilbaud et al., “Pregnancy outcome after first trimester exposure to ionizing radiations,” Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., vol. 232, pp. 18–21, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.001.

[11] International Commission on Radiological Protection, The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 103, Ann. ICRP, vol. 37, nos. 2–4, pp. 1–332, 2007.

[12] International Commission on Radiological Protection, Radiological Protection in Medicine, ICRP Publication 105, Ann. ICRP, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1–63, 2013.

[13] N. İ. Işıkcı, “Embryo/fetal doses from SPECT radiopharmaceuticals,” Turk. J. Oncol., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 301–308, 2022, doi: 10.5505/tjo.2022.3385.

[14] Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, “Guidelines for nuclear medicine procedures in pregnancy and lactation,” SNMMI Practice Guideline, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.snmmi.org/ClinicalPractice/content.aspx?ItemNumber=6414

[15] P. B. Zanzonico, “Internal radionuclide radiation dosimetry: A review of basic concepts and recent developments,” J. Nucl. Med., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 297–308, 2000.