Gender Differences in Verbal Abuse and Argument Strategies in Movies

• Hanan Abdalkareem Kadhim

  Ministry of education , Al-Nabugh Secondary School

• Maram Salam Abdul Kareem

  Ministry of education , Al-Nabugh Secondary School

• Nahid Raoof Kareem

  Ministry of education , Al-Nabugh Secondary

Background: Language serves as both a communicative tool and a means of exercising social power. In cinematic dialogues, verbal abuse and normal arguments often reflect deeper gendered communicative practices. Specific Background: While many studies focus on impoliteness or politeness theories separately, few have comparatively analyzed male and female speech in film discourse. Knowledge Gap: Limited research investigates how gender influences the use of verbal abuse strategies and speech acts in both aggressive and normal arguments within movies. Aim: This study examines linguistic differences between men and women in two films, Revolutionary Road and My Fault, by applying Evans’ verbal abuse model, Searle’s speech act theory, Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory, and Culpeper’s impoliteness framework. Results: Findings indicate that men predominantly employ name-calling and abusive anger with positive and negative impoliteness, whereas women frequently use judging and criticizing through bald on record and positive impoliteness. In normal arguments, men favor representative speech acts with negative politeness, while women rely on directive speech acts with bald on record politeness. Novelty: This comparative study integrates multiple pragmatic models to reveal systematic gendered patterns in cinematic communication. Implications: The results highlight how film dialogue reproduces gendered linguistic behavior, offering insights for discourse studies, gender linguistics, and media analysis.

Highlights:

1. Men use name-calling and abusive anger more.

2. Women rely on judging and criticizing.

3. Gendered patterns appear in both abuse and normal arguments.

Keywords: Verbal Abuse, Gender Differences, Politeness, Speech Acts, Impoliteness

[1] J. L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 1962.

[2] G. Basta, “Revolutionary Road: Review and Analysis of a Masterpiece,” Medium, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://giovannibasta.medium.com/revolutionary-road-review-and-analysis-of-a-masterpiece-c1f9d9128838

[3] E. L. Battistella, Bad Language: Are Some Words Better than Others? Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2005.

[4] D. Bousfield, Impoliteness in Struggle for Power. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008.

[5] P. Brown and S. Levinson, “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena,” in Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, E. Goody, Ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1978, pp. 15–26.

[6] P. Brown and S. C. Levinson, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987.

[7] J. Butler, Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 1997.

[8] J. Culpeper, “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness,” J. Pragmatics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 349–367, 1996.

[9] I. Diani, Arono, and Yunita, “A Pragmatics Study on Verbal Abuse Against Women and Children by Bengkulu Communities on Social Media, at Schools, and in Families,” Kembara: J. Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 225–238, 2022. doi: 10.22219/kembara.v8i2.21900

[10] P. Evans, The Verbally Abusive Relationship, 3rd ed. Avon, MA, USA: Adams Media, 2009, pp. 81–100.

[11] J. M. Gottman and N. Silver, The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. New York, NY, USA: Crown Publishing Group, 1999.

[12] D. Hitchcock, “Informal Logic and the Concept of Argument,” in Philosophy of Logic, D. Jacquette, Ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2007, pp. 101–129.

[13] H. Klein and K. S. Shiffman, “Verbal Aggression in Animated Cartoons,” Int. J. Child Adolesc. Health, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235989511

[14] Lilvakavivlu, “Movie Review: My Fault,” Wordpress Blog, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://lilvakavivlu.wordpress.com/2023/08/28/movie-review-my-fault/

[15] J. Marteney, “Arguing Using Critical Thinking,” LibreTexts, n.d. [Online]. Available: https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Communication/Argument_and_Debate/Arguing_Using_Critical_Thinking

[16] A. Muhammad and A. Diannurdianti, “The Use of Politeness Strategies Based on Gender Differences in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban Movie: A Socio-Pragmatic Study,” J. Bahasa Inggris Terapan, vol. 9, no. 2, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.polban.ac.id/inggris/article/download/5736/3539

[17] N. A. Yousif, “Socio-Pragmatic Study of Insulting in English News,” J. Almustadama Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378821013

[18] L. Mullany and P. Stockwell, Introducing English Language: A Resource Book for Students. Nottingham, U.K.: Routledge, 2010.

[19] J. O’Driscoll, Offensive Language: Taboo, Offence, and Social Control. London, U.K.: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.

[20] K. Pradhan, “The Impact of Language on Gender,” Bhairavi, vol. 22, no. 5, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.jvwu.ac.in/uploads/News/Document/ccebf0da-f9c8-4d86-9b2d-7dfbbf6feeb0.pdf

[21] J. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1969.

[22] J. R. Searle, Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985.

[23] L. H. Schwartzman, “Hate Speech, Illocution and Social Context: A Critique of Judith Butler,” J. Social Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 421–441, 2002.

[24] Shadows of Control, “Words That Wound: Distinguishing Verbal Abuse from Normal Arguments,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://shadowsofcontrol.com/articles/distinguishing-verbal-abuse-from-normal-arguments

[25] K. Stollznow, On the Offensive: Prejudice in Language Past and Present. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020.

[26] D. Suhandoko, L. Ariyanti, and E. Fitriana, “Impoliteness and Gender Differences in The Edge of Seventeen Movie,” J. Lit. Lang. Teach., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 228–242, 2021. doi: 10.15642/NOBEL.2021.12.2.228-242

[27] F. Subon, “Gender Differences in the Use of Linguistic Forms in the Speech of Men and Women in the Malaysian Context,” J. Humanities Social Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/87721581

[28] R. Tartory, A. M. Ali, and A. Khattab, “Critical Discourse Analysis of Verbal Violence in William Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice,” Theory Pract. Lang. Studies, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1870–1878, 2022. doi: 10.17507/tpls.1209.24

[29] N. Thielemann and P. Kosta, Eds., Approaches to Slavic Interaction. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2013.

[30] E. Walaszewska and A. Piskorska, Eds., Relevance Theory: More than Understanding. Newcastle, U.K.: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012.

[31] A. Wierzbicka, English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. Sydney, Australia: Academic Press, 1987.